{"id":4813,"date":"2026-07-11T09:12:24","date_gmt":"2026-07-11T01:12:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.nlscientific.com\/atterberg-limits-test-astm-d4318-bs-1377-2\/"},"modified":"2026-07-11T09:20:16","modified_gmt":"2026-07-11T01:20:16","slug":"atterberg-limits-test-astm-d4318-bs-1377-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nlscientific.com\/en_ph\/atterberg-limits-test-astm-d4318-bs-1377-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Atterberg Limits Test (ASTM D4318 \/ BS 1377-2): Method &#038; Apparatus"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!-- nleeat --><\/p>\n<div class=\"nl-guide-meta\" style=\"border-left:4px solid #10243e;background:#f4f7fb;padding:12px 16px;margin:0 0 20px;font-size:14px;color:#3d4c60\">Written by the <strong>NL Scientific Engineering Team<\/strong> &middot; Reviewed by our <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nlscientific.com\/en_ph\/certifications\/\">ISO\/IEC 17025 (SAMM 835) accredited<\/a> calibration laboratory &middot; Last updated <strong>11 July 2026<\/strong><\/div>\n<p>The <strong>Atterberg limits test<\/strong> defines the water contents at which a fine-grained soil changes behaviour \u2014 the liquid limit (LL), plastic limit (PL) and the derived plasticity index (PI = LL &minus; PL). These values classify clays and silts and predict settlement and swelling behaviour.<\/p>\n<h2>What the Test Measures<\/h2>\n<p>LL is the moisture content at which soil passes from plastic to liquid state; PL is the content at which it begins to crumble when rolled to a 3 mm thread. Together they anchor the Unified and AASHTO classification systems via the plasticity chart.<\/p>\n<h2>Apparatus Required<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Casagrande liquid limit device with grooving tool (ASTM) or 80 g \/ 30&deg; cone penetrometer (BS 1377-2 definitive method)<\/li>\n<li>Glass plate and 3 mm rod gauge for plastic limit rolling<\/li>\n<li>425 &micro;m sieve, mixing dishes, spatulas<\/li>\n<li>Moisture content tins, balance (0.01 g) and drying oven at 105&ndash;110 &deg;C<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Test Procedure<\/h2>\n<ol>\n<li>Prepare about 200 g of soil passing the 425 &micro;m sieve, mixed to a stiff paste and matured.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Cone method:<\/strong> fill the cup, drop the cone for 5 s, record penetration; repeat at increasing moisture until four points span 15&ndash;25 mm penetration. LL = moisture content at 20 mm penetration.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Casagrande method:<\/strong> groove the soil pat and count blows to close 13 mm; LL = moisture at 25 blows from the flow curve.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Plastic limit:<\/strong> roll threads to 3 mm until they crumble; take the moisture content of the crumbled threads.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h2>Calculation &amp; Reporting<\/h2>\n<p>Report LL, PL and PI to the nearest whole number with the method used. Plot PI against LL on the plasticity chart: above the A-line (PI = 0.73(LL&minus;20)) the soil is clay (C), below it silt (M); LL &gt; 50 marks high plasticity.<\/p>\n<h2>Acceptance Criteria<\/h2>\n<p>Typical values: low-plasticity clay LL 30&ndash;50, PI 10&ndash;25; high-plasticity clay LL &gt; 50, PI &gt; 25. Earthworks specifications commonly cap PI (e.g. sub-base PI &le; 6, structural fill PI &le; 20) \u2014 check the governing road authority spec.<\/p>\n<h2>Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n<h3>Cone penetrometer or Casagrande \u2014 which is better?<\/h3>\n<p>The fall cone is the definitive BS\/Eurocode method: it is operator-independent and more repeatable. The Casagrande device remains the ASTM reference; results differ slightly, so state the method with every result.<\/p>\n<h3>Why must the sample pass the 425 &micro;m sieve?<\/h3>\n<p>Atterberg limits describe the fine fraction only. Coarser particles interfere with the groove and thread behaviour and would bias both LL and PL upward.<\/p>\n<h2>Recommended Apparatus<\/h2>\n<p>NL Scientific manufactures the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nlscientific.com\/en_ph\/product\/motorized-liquid-limit-apparatus-adv\/\">Motorized Liquid Limit Apparatus (ADV)<\/a> for this method. Browse the full <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nlscientific.com\/en_ph\/product-category\/soil\/\">Soil Testing Equipment<\/a> range or <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nlscientific.com\/en_ph\/contact-us\/\">request a quotation<\/a> from our engineers.<\/p>\n<p><!-- nlfaq --><br \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\">{\"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\", \"@type\": \"FAQPage\", \"mainEntity\": [{\"@type\": \"Question\", \"name\": \"Cone penetrometer or Casagrande \u2014 which is better?\", \"acceptedAnswer\": {\"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"The fall cone is the definitive BS\/Eurocode method: it is operator-independent and more repeatable. The Casagrande device remains the ASTM reference; results differ slightly, so state the method with every result.\"}}, {\"@type\": \"Question\", \"name\": \"Why must the sample pass the 425 \u00b5m sieve?\", \"acceptedAnswer\": {\"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"Atterberg limits describe the fine fraction only. Coarser particles interfere with the groove and thread behaviour and would bias both LL and PL upward.\"}}]}<\/script><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Written by the NL Scientific Engineering Team &middot; Reviewed by our ISO\/IEC 17025 (SAMM 835) accredited calibration laboratory &middot; Last updated 11 July 2026 The Atterberg limits test defines the&hellip;<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3934,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[164,177],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4813","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blog","category-soil-testing"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nlscientific.com\/en_ph\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4813","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nlscientific.com\/en_ph\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nlscientific.com\/en_ph\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nlscientific.com\/en_ph\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nlscientific.com\/en_ph\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4813"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nlscientific.com\/en_ph\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4813\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4846,"href":"https:\/\/www.nlscientific.com\/en_ph\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4813\/revisions\/4846"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nlscientific.com\/en_ph\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3934"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nlscientific.com\/en_ph\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4813"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nlscientific.com\/en_ph\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4813"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nlscientific.com\/en_ph\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4813"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}