{"id":4810,"date":"2026-07-11T09:12:06","date_gmt":"2026-07-11T01:12:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.nlscientific.com\/concrete-flexural-strength-test-en-12390-5-astm-c78\/"},"modified":"2026-07-11T09:20:24","modified_gmt":"2026-07-11T01:20:24","slug":"concrete-flexural-strength-test-en-12390-5-astm-c78","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nlscientific.com\/en_ph\/concrete-flexural-strength-test-en-12390-5-astm-c78\/","title":{"rendered":"Concrete Flexural Strength Test (EN 12390-5 \/ ASTM C78): Method &#038; Apparatus"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!-- nleeat --><\/p>\n<div class=\"nl-guide-meta\" style=\"border-left:4px solid #10243e;background:#f4f7fb;padding:12px 16px;margin:0 0 20px;font-size:14px;color:#3d4c60\">Written by the <strong>NL Scientific Engineering Team<\/strong> &middot; Reviewed by our <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nlscientific.com\/en_ph\/certifications\/\">ISO\/IEC 17025 (SAMM 835) accredited<\/a> calibration laboratory &middot; Last updated <strong>11 July 2026<\/strong><\/div>\n<p>The <strong>concrete flexural strength test<\/strong> determines the modulus of rupture of a hardened concrete beam \u2014 the tensile strength of concrete in bending. It is the reference test for pavement and airfield slab design, where slabs fail in flexure rather than compression.<\/p>\n<h2>What the Test Measures<\/h2>\n<p>A prismatic beam specimen (typically 100&times;100&times;500 mm or 150&times;150&times;750 mm) is loaded until failure using centre-point or third-point loading. The stress at rupture in the extreme fibre is reported as flexural strength, usually 10&ndash;15% of the compressive strength.<\/p>\n<h2>Apparatus Required<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li>Flexural testing machine or flexural frame attachment with two support rollers and one or two loading rollers<\/li>\n<li>Beam moulds (100 or 150 mm square section) and compaction equipment<\/li>\n<li>Steel rule and square for locating rollers<\/li>\n<li>Curing tank maintained at 20 &plusmn; 2 &deg;C (EN) or 23 &plusmn; 2 &deg;C (ASTM)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Test Procedure<\/h2>\n<ol>\n<li>Cast and cure beam specimens; test saturated, immediately after removal from curing.<\/li>\n<li>Mark support and load positions; centre the beam on the rollers with the trowelled face out of contact.<\/li>\n<li>Apply load without shock at a constant stress rate of 0.04&ndash;0.06 MPa\/s (EN 12390-5) until rupture.<\/li>\n<li>Record maximum load and the fracture position.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h2>Calculation &amp; Reporting<\/h2>\n<p>For third-point loading with fracture inside the middle third: <em>f<sub>cf<\/sub> = F&middot;L \/ (b&middot;d&sup2;)<\/em>, where F is the maximum load, L the span, and b, d the section dimensions. Report to the nearest 0.1 MPa with specimen size, curing regime and fracture location.<\/p>\n<h2>Acceptance Criteria<\/h2>\n<p>Typical structural concrete achieves 3&ndash;5 MPa flexural strength at 28 days; rigid pavement specifications commonly require a characteristic value of 4.0&ndash;4.5 MPa. If fracture falls outside the middle third by more than 5% of the span (third-point method), the result is discarded.<\/p>\n<h2>Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n<h3>Centre-point or third-point loading \u2014 which should I use?<\/h3>\n<p>Third-point loading (ASTM C78, EN 12390-5) stresses the whole middle third equally and gives more representative, slightly lower values than centre-point loading (ASTM C293), which forces failure at one section. Specify the method when reporting.<\/p>\n<h3>Can flexural strength be estimated from compressive strength?<\/h3>\n<p>Only approximately \u2014 correlations such as 0.7&radic;f&#8217;c are mix-specific. Pavement acceptance should always use measured beam results, not converted cube or cylinder values.<\/p>\n<h2>Recommended Apparatus<\/h2>\n<p>NL Scientific manufactures the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nlscientific.com\/en_ph\/product\/fully-automatic-flexural-testing-machine-for-fiber-reinforced-concrete-300kn\/\">Fully Automatic Flexural Testing Machine for FIBER-REINFORCED Concrete 300kN<\/a> for this method. Browse the full <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nlscientific.com\/en_ph\/product-category\/concrete\/\">Concrete Testing Equipment<\/a> range or <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nlscientific.com\/en_ph\/contact-us\/\">request a quotation<\/a> from our engineers.<\/p>\n<p><!-- nlfaq --><br \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\">{\"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\", \"@type\": \"FAQPage\", \"mainEntity\": [{\"@type\": \"Question\", \"name\": \"Centre-point or third-point loading \u2014 which should I use?\", \"acceptedAnswer\": {\"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"Third-point loading (ASTM C78, EN 12390-5) stresses the whole middle third equally and gives more representative, slightly lower values than centre-point loading (ASTM C293), which forces failure at one section. Specify the method when reporting.\"}}, {\"@type\": \"Question\", \"name\": \"Can flexural strength be estimated from compressive strength?\", \"acceptedAnswer\": {\"@type\": \"Answer\", \"text\": \"Only approximately \u2014 correlations such as 0.7\u221af'c are mix-specific. Pavement acceptance should always use measured beam results, not converted cube or cylinder values.\"}}]}<\/script><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Written by the NL Scientific Engineering Team &middot; Reviewed by our ISO\/IEC 17025 (SAMM 835) accredited calibration laboratory &middot; Last updated 11 July 2026 The concrete flexural strength test determines&hellip;<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3926,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[164,176],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4810","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blog","category-concrete-testing"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nlscientific.com\/en_ph\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4810","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nlscientific.com\/en_ph\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nlscientific.com\/en_ph\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nlscientific.com\/en_ph\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nlscientific.com\/en_ph\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4810"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.nlscientific.com\/en_ph\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4810\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4849,"href":"https:\/\/www.nlscientific.com\/en_ph\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4810\/revisions\/4849"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nlscientific.com\/en_ph\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3926"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nlscientific.com\/en_ph\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4810"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nlscientific.com\/en_ph\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4810"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nlscientific.com\/en_ph\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4810"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}